检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张小玲[1] 韦燕[2] 谢艳丽[3] 方宗壮 范咏梅[2] 张宇[2] 章程辉[1]
机构地区:[1]海南大学食品学院,海南海口570228 [2]海南大学环境与植物保护学院,海南海口570228 [3]海南大学分析测试中心,海南海口570228
出 处:《广东农业科学》2015年第12期86-90,共5页Guangdong Agricultural Sciences
基 金:海南省自然科学基金(214017)
摘 要:采用田间喷药、模拟家庭加工,结合HPLC和GC检测方法探究炒、炖、凉拌处理方式对豇豆中三唑磷和阿维菌素两种常用农药残留量的去除效果.结果表明:经过加工处理后的豇豆中三唑磷的去除率为32.6%~70.0%,阿维菌素的去除率为39.0%~78.0%.其中煨炖的方式对两种农药的去除效果最好,三唑磷去除率为58.9%~70.0%,阿维菌素去除率为72.9%~78.0%.豇豆经家庭加工处理后,农药残留量接近消费者膳食中的农药暴露水平,这对于保障消费者的膳食安全具有实际指导意义.The removal rate of 2 pesticides, triazophos and abamectin, in cowpea in the family processing of stir-fly, stew and cold were studied through HPLC and GC techniques, using the field spraying and simulated family processing methods. The results showed that the removal rate of triazophos in cowpea was 32.6%-70.0%, and that of abamectin was 39.0%-78.0% after processing. Among the 3 methods, the effect of stew was the best with triazophos and abamectin removal rates of 58.9%-70.0% and 72.9%-78.0%, respectively. The results indicated that the residues were more close to the exposure level of pesticide in consumer diet after family processing, and it was guaranteed to the safe consumer diet with practical significance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38