检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李清[1,2] 刘慧霞[1] 周少基[1] 周文红[1] 田光超[1,3] 李鲜能[1,4]
机构地区:[1]广西大学轻工与食品工程学院,广西南宁530004 [2]广西南华商贸有限公司,广西南宁530022 [3]云南省轻纺工业设计院,云南昆明650041 [4]华泰长城期货有限公司,广西南宁530022
出 处:《食品研究与开发》2015年第13期5-8,共4页Food Research and Development
基 金:广西科学基金项目(2011GXNSFC018006;桂科转1298009-13)
摘 要:为了探索糖汁清浊分流澄清新工艺,研究甘蔗压榨中一压汁、二压汁和混合汁的常规成分、无机成分及氨基酸含量的差异。采用甘蔗制糖统一分析方法、电感耦合等离子体发光光谱仪(ICP-AES)、氨基酸分析仪等检测分析方法。结果发现,一压汁的品质优于混合汁,显著优于二压汁。与一压汁相比:混合汁的纯度低1.53 Gp,色值高35.21%(3 358 IU560),无机成分高16.59%,氨基酸含量高19.00%;二压汁纯度低5.22 Gp,色值高60.24%(5 745 IU560),无机成分高58.07%,氨基酸含量高41.11%。蔗汁中的非糖分主要集中在二压汁中。In order to investigate the novel cane juice clarification process through the clear and turbid juice distributary, the conventional parameters and contents of mineral components and amino acids of the first expressed juice, second expressed juice and mixed juice were determined and their differences investigated. The standard analytical method for cane suagr process incorporating the ICP-AES , the amino acid analyzer etc. was adopted. The result showed that compared with the first expressed juice , the purity of the mixed juice was lower by 1.53 Gp, the value of color higher by 35.21%(3 358 IU560), the inorganic component higher by 16.59%, the content of amino acid higher by 19.00%, and the purity of the second expressed juice was lower by 5.22 Gp , the value of color higher by 60.24%(5 745 IU560), the inorganic component higher by 58.07%, the content of amino acid higher by 41.11%. The quality of the first expressed juice was better than that of the mixed juice and was significantly superior to that of the second expressed juice. The non-sugars were mainly remained in the second expressed juice.
分 类 号:TS255.44[轻工技术与工程—农产品加工及贮藏工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.191