试析一些逻辑教材所犯的逻辑错误  

On the Logical Mistakes by Some Logical Textbooks

作　　者：罗振乾 

机构地区：[1]广西师范学院中文学院,广西南宁530001

出　　处：《广西师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第5期128-140,共13页Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：恢复高考以来,供高校文科专业使用的逻辑教材相继出版了几十本。有的教材一再修订出版,很受读者欢迎。但金无足赤,有些逻辑教材存在着瑕疵,某些逻辑知识有误,某些论证缺乏充足理由,某些例证用错,由于审校环节的疏漏,这些逻辑教材竟然犯了一些逻辑错误。笔者试析一些逻辑教材所犯的逻辑错误,供编写逻辑教材的专家参考,并就教于方家。Dozens of logical textbooks for liberal arts have been published since the college en-trance exam was resumed.Some textbooks popular with readers are repeatedly revised and published. However,nothing is perfect.There are some flaws in these logical textbooks：some logical knowledge is wrong,some of the arguments are lack of adequate reasons,and some examples use inappropriate-ly.Because of omissions of revision,these logical textbooks have made some logical mistakes.The au-thor tries to analyze these mistakes,in order to provide references for experts who write these logical books and provide guide for readers.

关 键 词：逻辑教材 逻辑错误 

分 类 号：B812[哲学宗教—逻辑学] G420[文化科学—课程与教学论]