社会规范认同研究的历史发展及应然转变——社会规范认同研究的现状及评价  

The Historical Development and Natural Change of the Study of the Social Norms Identity——The status quo and evaluation of social norms identity

作　　者：孔祥渊[1] 范文静[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学教育学部,北京100875

出　　处：《福建教育学院学报》2015年第8期1-3,128,共3页Journal of Fujian Institute of Education

摘　　要：当前社会规范认同研究有两种基本的范式:思辨型研究和经验型研究。这两种方式具有一定的可取之处,同时存在巨大问题:"实验"味道过浓导致"情境性"的缺乏。为弥补这一缺陷,研究者需要逐渐走入一种"情境型"社会规范认同研究,充分考虑社会规范认同的时代情境与文化情境。Currently, there are two basic paradigms of social norms identity:speculative type of research and em-pirical research. Both paradigms have some merit and a huge problem:too much“experimental” flavor leads to a lack of“context”. To compensate for this deficiency, researchers need to go to a study of “contextual” social norms identity, giving full consideration to time context and cultural context of social norms identity.

关 键 词：社会规范认同研究 思辨型 经验型 情境型 

分 类 号：G417[文化科学—教育学]