“世界文学翻译”:文化转向之后的“转向”  

“World Literary Translation”:A Post-Turn After “Cultural Turn”

作　　者：陈红玉[1] 方汉文[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州市职业大学苏州大学,江苏苏州215000

出　　处：《中国文学研究》2015年第4期119-123,共5页Research of Chinese Literature

基　　金：作者国家社会科学基金重点项目"世界文学史新建构"的中国化阐释(12AZD090)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：21世纪兴起的"世界文学翻译"应视为国际翻译理论继"文化转向"之后的一次"后转向"。其主流观念源自当代美国的"世界文学史新建构"与世界文学文本翻译的实践。核心观点包括对翻译定义、"文化差异"以及"反权力中心"等范畴的反诘;而"不可译性"与"反世界文学"等则是其中较为激进的观念,归根结底"世界文学翻译"所质疑的目标是"权力中心论",但不能因翻译的"文化差异"而走向"不可译论"。其实正是"世界文学翻译"中的翻译阐释论,扭转了长期以来文化一体论与冲突论之间的对立,引导世界翻译实践走向差异与同一的新"建构"。The rise of the ＂world literary translation＂ in twenty-first Century is a post-turn after the ＂cultural turn＂ of internation- al translation theory. The mainstream concept origins from the new construction of world literary history and world literary translation practices, including counter-questian towards the definition of translation, the ＂culture difference＂ as well as ＂spacing＂. Untranslatabili- ty and ＂against world literature＂ are the challenging forces towards this trend. The theory system questioned by ＂world literary transla- tion＂ is the ＂literary world system＂ featured as power-centered discourse. Although ＂world literary translation＂ is highly critical, its essence is still a substitute for the anti-cuhure power view of Western post-modern criticism in the translation study.

关 键 词：世界文学翻译 不可译性 翻译阐释 

分 类 号：I0-03[文学—文学理论]