远程教育学术期刊论文研究范式的元分析  

Meta-analysis of Research Paradigm in Distance Education Journals

作　　者：冯晓英[1] 李秋菊[1] 陈悦[1] 刘月[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学远程教育研究中心,北京100875

出　　处：《中国电化教育》2015年第12期49-58,共10页China Educational Technology

摘　　要：过去十几年远程教育研究的快速发展,要求我们对远程教育研究进行回顾与反思,特别是对研究的方法与路径进行反思和梳理。该研究从研究范式的视角对国内八本远程教育领域核心期刊近五年来的3504篇文献进行了元分析,从研究范式、研究方法、研究主题、研究规范性四个方面进行了分析与比较。研究结果发现,我国远程教育类学术期刊中实证主义、阐释主义、批判主义、实用主义等四类研究范式的研究论文占到了文章总量的40%左右,研究方法多样,研究主题广泛,实证主义研究论文的规范性整体较高。最后,作者参考国际远程教育学术期刊和学术研究的现状,为国内远程教育研究论文提出了五条建议:提高成熟度、提高适切性、提高多样性、提高规范性、提高严谨性,希望该项研究能够为国内远程教育学术期刊和研究者提供参考。The rapid development of distance education research in recent decades called for more review and reflection on it, especially on the research method and research route. This research used meta-analysis to study 3504 papers published on 8 Chinese core periodicals in recent five years（2010-2014）, analyzing their paradigms, methods, topics and specification in a research paradigm perspective. The study found that, papers of four research paradigms, including positivism, constructivist, critical and pragmatic, counted 40% of all papers in these periodicals. Different kinds of methods were used and various topics were covered. Papers of positivism research complied with the academic specifications best in four paradigm papers. Five suggestions were given for distance education periodicals and researchers in China based on international distance education journals and the present situation of academic research, which are： improving the maturity, fitness, diversity, specification and preciseness.

关 键 词：远程教育 研究范式 研究方法 

分 类 号：G434[文化科学—教育学]