证券欺诈民事救济的困境与出路  

The Dilemma and Outlet of Civil Remedy for Security Frauds

作　　者：岳冰[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南财经政法大学民商经济法学院,河南郑州450046

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2016年第1期102-111,共10页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

摘　　要：在我国证券法上,证券欺诈民事救济相对缓滞,即使是法律规定较为全面的虚假陈述案件,在实践中也存在起诉率低、起诉的投资者偏少的困境,造成上述困境的原因既有制度的缺陷,如立法缺失、前置程序、管辖制度、诉讼模式等的限制,也有法院、法官和投资者的因素。应当从以下方面予以完善:第一,从立法层面继续完善证券民事责任制度;第二,改革现有的证券案件管辖制度,设立专业化和职业化的证券法庭;第三,进一步改革和扩展前置程序;第四,改革现有的诉讼模式;第五,建立投资者先行赔付制度。In the practice,the civil remedy for security frauds reflects lagging. Even the law provides the rules for security fraud litigations,the cases and investors perusing it are relatively limited,which can be attributed to the limitations of the imperfect legislation,pre procedure,jurisdictional system,and the litigation mode.Therefore,the courts in China are reluctant to accept the sues of security fraud. On analyzing the reasons of the dilemma,the author proposes five solutions. Firstly,expanding the scope of the cases; secondly,reforming the jurisdiction rules set up profession security courts; thirdly,reforming and expanding the pre procedures; fourthly,reforming the litigation model; fifthly,establishing the invested prepaid rules.

关 键 词：证券欺诈 民事救济 前置程序 诉讼形式 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]