检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津商业大学法学院心理学系,天津300134 [2]天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,心理健康与社会心态协同创新中心,天津300074
出 处:《心理与行为研究》2016年第1期14-19,共6页Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基 金:天津市教育科学“十二五”规划重点课题(HE2014)
摘 要:以144名大学生为被试,采用参照性交流范式,设计复杂性不同的材料,创设功能预测和维度选择任务,探查比较参照性交流双方学习效果与选择性注意特点。结果:高成绩组block10成绩显著高于低成绩组,关系复杂性主效应显著,参照性交流双方维度选择结果不存在显著差异,关系复杂性影响维度选择的整体结果、有关维度选择结果。表明:双方学习效果不平衡,但选择性注意协调一致,均不受复杂性影响。Undergraduate students have participated in the current study. The study designed three kinds of experimental materials. The relational complexity is manipulated. The tasks of functional prediction and dimensional selection were used to explore the characteristics of the learning result and selective attention between referential communicators by the paradigm of referential communication. The results showed that: The scores of the high- score group are significantly higher than the low-score group in Block 10. The main effect of relational complexity is significant. The results of dimensional selection are not significantly different between referential communicators. The relational complexity affects the results of dimensional selection and relative dimensional selection. The results suggested that: The learning results between referential communicators are unbalanced, and this imbalance is not affected by relational complexity. However, selective attention shows coherence between referential communicators. This coherence is not affected by relational complexity.
关 键 词:参照性交流 关系复杂性 学习效果 选择性注意 不平衡性.
分 类 号:B842.3[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.237.210