明代古诗选本与谢灵运——兼议何景明“古诗亡于谢”  

Anthology of Ancient Poems in Ming Dynasty and Xie Ling-yun

作　　者：岳进[1] 

机构地区：[1]长安大学文学艺术与传播学院,陕西西安710064

出　　处：《衡阳师范学院学报》2016年第1期70-76,共7页Journal of Hengyang Normal University

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"明代古诗;唐诗选本与诗学论争"资助(11YJC751114);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(CHDW2012ZD 010);长安大学基础研究支持计划专项基金资助阶段性成果

摘　　要：明代古诗选本对谢灵运的编选、评点,与六朝诗歌总集、谢灵运诗集及诗文评,相互回应与影响,一方面,以何景明"古诗之法亡于谢"为争议焦点,从杨慎、黄省曾、李攀龙、王世贞、胡应麟、许学夷到钟惺、谭元春、陆时雍,他们在谢灵运古诗的诗体意义、古诗格调等方面逐渐达成共识;同时,对其古诗格调和山水理趣的开掘又从不同流派的诗学视角展开,并在清代古诗评选中获得发展、完善,使谢灵运的诗史地位真正得以确立。Selection and comment of Xie Lingyun＇s poems in anthology of ancient poems in Ming Dynasty responded and influenced with Xie Lingyun＇s poems and commentary of Xie Lingyun＇s poems.He Jingming held the view that ancient poetry ended in Xie Lingyun＇s poems.This view was argued by many Schools.Yang Shen,Huang Shengzeng,Li Panlong,Wang Shizhen,Hu Yinglin,Xu Xueyi,and Zhong Xing,Tan Yuanchun,Lu Shiyong,they gradually reached an agreement in the aspects of verse meaning and Gediao of Xie Lingyun＇s poems.At the same time,from their own perspective different Schools explored the verse meaning and landscape interest of Xie Lingyun＇s poems.The argument and debate secured Xie Lingyun a position in the history of poetry.

关 键 词：谢灵运 古诗 选本 古意 理趣 竟陵派 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]