《说文解字注》中的“引申假借”探析  

Studies on Borrowed Characters and Extended Meaning in Shuowen Jie Zhu

作　　者：蒋莹[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学文学与新闻传播学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《唐山师范学院学报》2016年第1期22-25,共4页Journal of Tangshan Normal University

摘　　要：段玉裁在《说文解字注》中曾指出引申义是"于本义引申之",假借是"用此字之声而不用此字之义者"。《说文解字注》中除了系统地标注了"引申"和"假借"两种类型外,还有一种特殊的类型,即"引申(伸)假(叚)借"。通过系统的分析,发现段玉裁认为的"引申假借"中有些是词义引申,有些是假借,还有些不是引申也不是假借。段玉裁的这种不科学的表述是由他所处时代的历史局限性和汉语、汉字的复杂性造成的。Duan Yu-cai defines in Shuowen Jiezi Zhu that the extended meaning is the extension of the original meaning, and the borrowing is the phenomenon of character usage which uses the sound of a character but neglects its meaning. In Shuowen Jiezi Zhu, besides the annotation of extension and borrowing, there is a special so-called extended borrowing. According to the systematic analysis, it is found that among the extended borrowing instances which are pointed out by Duan Yu-cai, some are meaning extension, some are borrowing, and some are neither meaning extension nor borrowing. This kind of unscientific statement which was made by Duan Yu-cai was due to the historical limitation of his era and the complexity of the Chinese language and Chinese characters.

关 键 词：说文解字注 引申 假借 

分 类 号：H161[语言文字—汉语]