检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛晓阳[1]
出 处:《清华大学教育研究》2016年第1期47-54,共8页Tsinghua Journal of Education
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"现代生活方式与道德教育"(11JJD880020);江苏高校协同创新计划"基础教育人才培养模式协同创新中心研究成果"(苏政办发[2013]56号)
摘 要:教育理论与实践的关系问题,已经得到相对清理,但尚未得到广泛认同。其中,既有学理冲突的原因,又有政治历史的背景,逐渐成为教育理论的一个问题和负担。对两者关系的重新建构,既不在于否定理论联系实际并指导实践的价值,也不在于理论改变实践作为检验理论的标准,而在于重新认识教育理论存在的自足性,以及教育理论与实践复杂而多样的关联方式,改变在两者关系上长期形成的自以为不证自明的逻辑。The relationship between educational theory and practice is relatively clear,but has not been widely accepted,for theory conflict and for historical and political reasons. Gradually,it has become an issue in and a burden on educational theory. Reconstructing the relationship between educational theory and practice does not mean denying the value of linking theory with practice and guiding practice with theory. Nor does it mean abandoning practice as the criterion for testing theory. Rather,it means re-recognizing the self-sufficiency of educational theory and the complex and diverse relationships between educational theory and practice,changing what has been considered the self-evident logical relationship between the two.
分 类 号:G40-01[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222