检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘铮[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学哲学系
出 处:《北方论丛》2016年第3期142-146,共5页The Northern Forum
摘 要:海德格尔从批判西方传统的符合论真理观出发,提出了他的存在论真理观。海德格尔把技术纳入到其存在论的思想框架中,认为技术是一种产出,技术的本质在于解蔽,技术是真理的发生方式。技术因而在存在论意义上与艺术和真理具有本质的同源性。但是,作为"集置"的现代技术却是对存在的僭越和对真理的伪装,使技术与艺术又有着明显的区隔,它因而需要依于本源而居的艺术以及作为艺术之本质的诗的救渡。Martin Heidegger criticized the traditional correspondence theory of truth,and proposed his ontological theory of truth.He put technology into his own ontological thought framework,and connected with truth problems. That is to say,for Heidegger,technology as a sort of"bring-forth"( poiesis),technology as the genesis of truth,and the essence of technology is aletheia. Thus,from the perspective of ontology,the essence of technology shares the same origin with arts and truth. However,modern technology as the so-called"Ge-stell"is the arrogation of Being and the camouflage of truth,in this sense,technology and arts have the obvious difference. Therefore,technology needs the salvation from arts and poems( Ditchtung),in which the origin dwell.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3