两版小学数学教科书习题设计的比较研究——以“20以内数的认识和加减法”为例  被引量:10

The Comparative Study of Exercises in Two Versions of Mathematics Textbooks for Chinese Elementary Schools:a Case Study of“Number,Addition and Subtraction within 20”

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:裴蕾丝 尚俊杰[1] 马云鹏[2] 

机构地区:[1]北京大学教育学院,北京100871 [2]东北师范大学教育学部,吉林长春130024

出  处:《课程.教材.教法》2016年第6期68-75,61,共9页Curriculum,Teaching Material and Method

基  金:2013年教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"利用教育游戏培养学生创造力的理论与实践研究"(13YJA880061)

摘  要:以"20以内数的认识和加减法"为研究对象,结果发现,两版教科书在习题的考查内容和作答方式上没有显著不同,但在习题的数量和呈现方式上却存在较大差异。建议两版教科书在保留各自特色的前提下,能为不同能力水平的学生设定习题练习数量的参考标准,能让习题的呈现和作答方式动态适应既定的教学目标和学生的认知特征,同时进一步加快电子教科书的设计和开发。In this research, two kinds of Chinese official mathematics textbooks for elementary schools are studied: PEP and BNU. The exercises about number recognition and basic calculations within 20 in PEP and BNU are analyzedand compared according to the following three criteria: presentation, target knowledge and answering type. The final result indicates that these two kinds of textbooks have both similarities and differences in the three aspects above. Compared with BNU, PEP textbooks include more quantity of exercises but with less meaningful illustrations for these exercises. But when considering the target knowledge and answering types, the two kinds of textbooks are similar. After a close analyzing, we come up with three suggestions for further improvement on exercises design for next version of textbooks.

关 键 词:小学数学教科书 习题设计 20以内数的认识 20以内数的加减法 

分 类 号:G623.5[文化科学—教育学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象