心电图图形顺序教学方法的研究与实践  

Research and Practice of Graphic-sequenced Memory Method in Electrocardiogram Teaching

作　　者：岳荣铮[1] 曾锐[2] 谭淳予[3] 王覃[4] 邝璞[5] 田攀文[6] 左川[7] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学华西医院肾脏内科,成都610041 [2]四川大学华西医院心脏内科,成都610041 [3]四川大学华西医院风湿免疫科,成都610041 [4]四川大学华西医院内分泌代谢科,成都610041 [5]四川大学华西医院血液内科,成都610041 [6]四川大学华西医院呼吸内科,成都610041 [7]四川大学华西医院内科,成都610041

出　　处：《华西医学》2016年第5期968-971,共4页West China Medical Journal

摘　　要：目的验证"心电图图形顺序理解"在心电图教学中的实际效果。方法 2014年5月将100名学生随机分配进入传统教学组(50人)和创新教学组(50人),传统教学组采取传统的教材、教学方法及教学大纲,而创新教学组则采用全新的教材、教学模式及大纲进行心电图形顺序理解教学。学习结束后,采用20例心电图的判读作为考核教学效果的方法。结果传统教学组的平均阅读时间为(32.0±4.8)min,而创新教学组平均阅读时间(18.0±3.6)min;传统教学组的判读成功率仅为(43.0±5.2)%,创新教学组则高达(77.0±9.6)%。结论通过心电图图形顺序理解这一创新的教学方法,可以明显提高学生学习的效果,值得在心电图教学中加以推广。Objective To explore the actual effect of ＂graphic-sequenced memory method＂ in teaching electrocardiogram（ECG）.Methods One hundred students were randomly divided into a traditional teaching group（n=50） and an innovative teaching group（n=50） in May,2014.Teachers in the traditional teaching group utilized the traditional teaching outline,and teachers in the innovative teaching group received training in the new teaching method and syllabus.All students took an examination in the final semester by analyzing 20 ECGs from real clinical cases and gave their ECG reports.Results The average ECG reading time was（32.0±4.8） minutes for the traditional teaching group and（18.0±3.6） minutes for the innovative teaching group.The average ECG accuracy results were（43.0±5.2）%for the traditional teaching group and（77.0±9.6）%for the innovative teaching group.Conclusions ECG learning is an important branch of the cardiac discipline,but ECG＇s mechanisms are intricate and the learning content scattered.Textbooks tend to make students feel confused due to the restrictions of the length and format of the syllabi,and there are many other limitations.Graphic-sequenced memory method is a useful method which can be fully used in ECG teaching.

关 键 词：教学方法 教学效果 课堂教学 心电图 图形顺序记忆 

分 类 号：R-4[医药卫生] G642[文化科学—高等教育学]