明理与过言——论张载对庄子的评述  

Demonstration of Truth and Inappropriate Remarks——Zhang Zai's comment on Chuang-Tzu

作　　者：刘泉[1] 

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学哲学系,陕西西安710119

出　　处：《宝鸡文理学院学报（社会科学版）》2016年第3期33-36,共4页Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences：Social Science Edition

基　　金：陕西省社会科学基金项目:<横渠易说>校注与哲学思想研究(项目编号:2014C01)

摘　　要：张载之学以六经为本而不废佛道精髓,尤其重视老庄的思想资源。张载认为,庄子明"理"但过于极端,终以之为梦幻。张载认可庄子所明之理,而批评其过言、过动,并常以庄子为鉴,警示学者。张载强调,学者当立心求道以明理,使天德得以盛大,使仁义能熟于内外,使天地之性与帅能在自身中得到充分的发挥。Zhang Zai’s theory was base on Confucian,absorbing the essence of Buddhism,and Taoism,particularly Taoism by Lao Tzu and Chuang Tzu.Zhang Zai thought Chuang Tzu was a little extreme.Zhang Zai’s more fully absorbed the advantages of Chuang Tzu,pointing out his miscon-duct.Forming their own ideas at the same time,scholars should be aspired to learn the truth.

关 键 词：张载 庄子 明理 过言 

分 类 号：B244.4[哲学宗教—中国哲学]