检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广州科技贸易职业学院,广州511442 [2]华南师范大学心理应用研究中心/心理学院,广州510631
出 处:《心理科学》2016年第4期856-861,共6页Journal of Psychological Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(31571142);全国优秀博士论文作者专项基金(201204);广东省高等学校优秀青年教师培养计划资助项目(Yq2013047)的资助
摘 要:根据实验材料中主人公和目标行为的关系,将研究材料分为一致和恢复一致两种,实验1采用独立记得-知道范式,实验2采用加工分离范式共同探讨焦点阅读中信息加工的意识性。研究结果发现被试在两种实验条件下,有意识加工和无意识加工都差异显著,说明在焦点阅读中读者有意识地建构命题表征和情境模型。Using the Independence-Remember-Know (IRK) and Process-Dissociation-Procedure (PDP) paradigms, Long et al. (2006) found that the construction of the situation model was conscious while the construction of the text base was unconscious in text reading. This is inconsistent with the processing theory of Bi-mechanism that states that the construction of the situation model is unconscious in coherence-based reading while the construction of the situation model is conscious in focus-based reading. With a careful examination of the experiment materials, we found that the materials were familiar themes by subjects and the nature of experimental materials was not clear. We maintained that the evidence given by Long was somehow inadequate to prove the fact that the construction of text base was unconscious while the construction of the situation model was conscious if the tested materials were unfamiliar and its nature was clear. In the current study, two experiments were designed to explore the consciousness of text representation in focus-based reading using the IRK and PDP paradigms. A self-paced and line-by-line reading paradigm was used in this study. In experiment 1, 40 undergraduate students were asked to read 12 narrative passages. According to the relationship between the elaboration on a characteristic of the protagonist and the subsequent target action carried out by the protagonist, the independent variables had two levels: A consistent version and a qualified version. The dependent variable was the rate of the "remember" or "know" judgment. The participants were randomly assigned to one of the two material sets. After reading all of the texts, the participants received the recognition test. They were instructed to press one key if they believed the sentence was not presented in texts that they had read before. Otherwise, the participants were instructed to press the other key if they believed the sentence had appeared in the texts they had read. Then they were asked to decide whether th
分 类 号:B842.7[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.183.63