检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄炳[1]
出 处:《南宁职业技术学院学报》2016年第5期35-39,共5页Journal of Nanning College for Vocational Technology
摘 要:20世纪末"烹饪热"背景下的烹饪文化和饮食文化研究中,依附于中医药的传统营养理论还是近现代营养科学建立当代中国烹饪理论体系,是学界争论的焦点之一,但传统论者坚持的"养助益充"只是中餐的膳食结构,并非真正的传统营养理论。季鸿崑对《黄帝内经》等传统医籍经文进行系统的研探审辨,认为中医的"营卫学说"才是真正的中华传统营养理论,而且它还是一个系统而完整的学术体系。对"营卫学说"进行深入解读,需要将中医的学术术语、概念与近现代营养科学进行对译。In the researches on cooking culture and catering culture under the backgrouund of the craze for cooking towards the end of the 20th century, whether contemporary Chinese cooking theory system was developed based on traditional Chinese medicine-based traditional nutrition theory or modern nutrition science is one of the focuses of academic debates. After probing into traditional medical works like "Yingwei Theory", Ji Hongkun argued that traditional Chinese medicine-based "Yingwei Theory"should be the true Chinese traditional nutrition theory, which should also be a systematic and complete academic system. The in-depth interpretation of "Yingwei Theory" calls for intertranslation between TCM academic terms and modern nutrition science.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68