检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国食品药品检定研究院,北京100050 [2]中国药科大学,江苏南京211100
出 处:《中国生化药物杂志》2016年第10期5-8,共4页Chinese Journal of Biochemical Pharmaceutics
基 金:中国食品药品检定研究院2015年中青年发展研究基金(2015A02)
摘 要:本文阐述了中国药典、美国药典、英国药典、日本药局方中胰酶标准的历史沿革,并对现行版四国药典胰酶标准进行比较和讨论,发现各国药典胰酶标准各有异同,其中活力限度要求差异较大,应予以重视,就效价测定方法而言,美国药典、英国药典的方法更为合理。The history about pancreatin standards in different pharmacopeia,i. e. the Chinese Pharmacopoeia( Ch P),the United States Pharmacopoeia( USP),the British Pharmacopoeia( BP),and the Japanese Pharmacopoeia( JP) were clarified in this paper. As well as the latest edition of pancreatin standards in different pharmacopeia were compared and discussed. There are many similarities and differences of the pancreatin standards between Ch P and the three other pharmacopoeias. We should attach importance to the significant difference of the potency limitation in four countries' pharmacopoeia. Otherwise,the potency test method of pancreatin in USP and BP is more reasonable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.14.137.94