重返经典:教育史研究的进路与学术旨趣  

Return to the Classics:the Approach of Studying Education History and Academic Interests

作　　者：王兆璟[1] 王艳艳[2] 

机构地区：[1]教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地西北少数民族教育发展研究中心 [2]西北师范大学教育学院,甘肃兰州730070

出　　处：《教育理论与实践》2016年第12期9-13,共5页Theory and Practice of Education

基　　金：教育部2011年度新世纪人才支持项目资助

摘　　要：经典"缺失"是造成近年来教育史"学科危机"与"学术危机"的重要因素。已往呈现在教育史研究文本中的经典被"文本化",经典之于教育品行的提升、之于教育实践的智慧被遮蔽,从而失掉了经典所内含的精神张力,因而所谓的以经典研究为名的思想史研究也就剩下了空洞的外壳。在我们这个以文化复原为价值回归的时代,重返经典、重启经典内含的教育智慧并合理认识教育实践,进而使教育实践回归实践理性,应成为教育史研究者自然的学术旨趣,这也是教育史研究突破"学科危机"与"学术危机"的重要进路。The ＂missing＂ of classics is a significant factor of ＂Discipline Crisis＂ and ＂Academic Crisis＂ of the E- ducation History in recent years. Classics presented in research text of Education History are fully ＂Textual＂. The effect of classics on improving education conduct and wisdom to guide educational practice is covered, leading to the losing of the spirit of classics, so the research on the History of Thought in the name of the so-called classical studies only leaves empty shell. In the times of which culture recovery is value return, to return to the classics, to restart educational wis- dom contained in the classics, and to rationally understand educational practice, thereby enable educational practice to return its own standard should be natural academic interests of education history researchers, and it is also an important approach of studying education history to breakthrough ＂Discipline Crisis＂and ＂Academic Crisis＂.

关 键 词：教育史研究 教育经典 学科危机 学术危机 

分 类 号：G40[文化科学—教育学原理]