检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京理工大学经济管理学院
出 处:《中国人力资源开发》2017年第2期82-88,共7页Human Resources Development of China
基 金:国家社会科学基金"现代企业绩效工资与绩效评估公正性问题研究"(10BGL003);国家自然科学基金"绩效评估公正感的结构;前因及效应研究"(71172103)资助
摘 要:评估故意误差一直是组织绩效考核中人们关注的焦点问题。本文针对评估者故意误差中的宽大效应,通过文献综述的方法,从评估者动机、受评者因素、评估者与受评者二元关系、组织情境四个方面分析其来源。评估者动机主要包括和谐动机、激励动机和评估者印象管理;受评者因素主要包括受评者印象管理和其社会网络;评估者与受评者二元关系主要包括领导成员交换关系和评估者喜爱;组织情境主要包括组织文化、组织政治和绩效考核制度。研究首先指出评估者故意误差存在的合理性,同时给予企业管理者在实践工作中可以采取的减少评估故意误差的方法,最后指出未来研究方向。Intentional Bias has been organizational performance appraisal focus of attention. In this paper, the leniency of intentional bias in the evaluation, from the four aspects, they are the rater' s motivation, the ratee issues, rater-ratee dyadic issues and organizational context. Rater' s motivation mainly includes harmony, motivation and rater' s impression management. Ratee issues including their impression management and their social network. Rater-ratee dyadic issues mainly include leader-member exchange relationship (LMX) and rater liking. Organizational context includes organizational culture, organizational political and performance appraisal system. It is proposed that the organization managers need to identify the different results caused by the intentional bias, and finally point out the future research direction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.225