检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐兰平[1] 郭琦[2] 李海英[3] 张春鸣[4] 王晨奇[5] 金红[6] 王莉盈
机构地区:[1]上海市徐汇区中心医院内分泌科,200031 [2]上海市徐汇区中心医院普外科,200031 [3]上海市徐汇区中心医院骨科,200031 [4]上海市徐汇区中心医院五官科,200031 [5]上海市徐汇区中心医院肿瘤科,200031 [6]上海市徐汇区中心医院泌尿科,200031 [7]上海市徐汇区中心医院肾内科,200031
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2016年第33期4863-4865,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基 金:上海市徐汇区中心医院院级课题(2014C-06)
摘 要:目的探讨PBL教学模式培训对新入职护士核心能力的影响。方法选取2014年10月—2015年9月上海市徐汇区中心医院新入职护士27名为观察组,2013年9月—2014年8月新入职护士26名为对照组。观察组护士在传统带教基础上开展PBL教学模式培训,每月1期,共12期;对照组护士实施传统带教。比较培训后两组护士的核心能力及理论操作成绩。结果干预前两组护士核心能力量表各条目得分及理论操作成绩比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后观察组护士核心能力量表中评估和干预、交流、批判性思维、人际交往、知识综合、管理、领导、教学条目得分分别为(3.20±1.11),(4.25±1.25),(2.65±0.58),(4.85±1.89),(3.58±1.02),(2.10±1.29),(2.10±1.29),(3.08±1.12)分;对照组护士得分分别为(2.21±0.36),(3.68±1.31),(2.10±0.65),(4.21±1.02),(2.85±0.62),(1.65±0.35),(165±0.35),(2.51±0.39)分,差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为6.230,9.187,5.102,2.587,10.526,2.580,2.580,3.815;P<0.05)。干预后观察组护士理论操作成绩得分(87.74±2.21)分,对照组护士得分(75.15±1.59)分,差异有统计学意义(t=7.023,P<0.05)。结论应用PBL教学模式培训可有效提高新入职护士的核心能力及理论操作水平。Objective To discuss the effects of PBL teaching mode training on the core capability of new nurses. Methods Totally 27 nurses recuited from October 2014 to September 2015 in Xabui District Central Hospital of Shanghai,were selected as the observation group, while 26 nurses recuited from Semptember 2013 to August 2014 were selected as the control group. Nurses in the observation group received a 12-month PBL teaching mode training on the basis of traditional teaching method. While nurses in the control group received traditional teaching method. The core abiity and theoretical operation score of nurses in two groups were compared after training. Results Before the intervention, there is no significant difference in the score of items of nurses' core capability and the achievements of theoretical operation between two groups (P〉0.05). Mter the intervention, each individual item score of nurses' core capability was as the following: assessment and intervention ( 3.20 ± 1.11 ), communication ( 4.25 ± 1.25 ), critical thinking ( 2.65 ± 0.58 ), interpersonal communication (4.85± 1.89), comprehensive knowledge ( 3.58± 1.02), management ( 2.10± 1.29), leadership (2.10±1.29) and teaching (3.08±1.12); while the scores of those items in the control group were (2.21± 0. 36), (3.68±1.31), (2.10±0.65), (4.21±1.02), (2.85±0.62), (1.65±0.35), (1.65±0.35)and (2.51± 0. 39) (t=6, 230,9.187,5.102,2.587,10.526,2.580,2.580,3.815;P〈0.05). After the training, the score of theoretical operation in the observation group was (87.74±2.21), while the score in the control group was (75.15±1.59) (t=7.023,P〈0.05). Conclusions PBL teaching mode training can effectively improve the core ability and theoretical operation of new nurses.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43