检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邬大光[1] 滕曼曼[1] 李端淼 WU Da-guang TENG Man-man LI Duan-miao(Collaboration Innovation Center for Higher Education Quality Construction /Institute of Education, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)
机构地区:[1]厦门大学高等教育质量建设协同创新中心/教育研究院,福建厦门361005
出 处:《高等教育研究》2016年第12期56-65,共10页Journal of Higher Education
摘 要:大学本科毕业率具有深刻的质量内涵,是衡量高等教育质量的重要指标之一,然而我国高等教育界对此一直缺少应有的关注。分析中美两国本科生近十年的毕业率数据可以发现,美国大学本科毕业率约为50%,不同类型、不同竞争力的大学,乃至相同类型、相同竞争力的大学毕业率都存在明显差异;我国大学本科毕业率则高达90%以上,不同类型、不同竞争力的大学毕业率无明显差异。这表明两国的高等教育质量观及相关政策安排有明显差异。为实现建设高等教育强国的目标,必须对我国大学本科毕业率的持续攀升有一个清醒的认识。There're profound quality connotation in the graduation rate, which was one of the important indexes to measure the quality of higher education. However, there's lack of due attention on it in China higher education. Analyzing the graduation rates of Chinese and American undergraduates in the past ten years, it found the graduation rate of American undergraduates was about 50%, and there existed obvious difference among different types and different competitive universities, which also existed among the same type amt the same competitiveness universities; the graduation rate of Chinese undergraduate was as high as 90%, and there existed no obvious difference among different types and different competitive universities. It showed there were distinctive differences between China and America on the concept of higher education quality and policy arrangements. Under the background of advo cating connotation construction of higher education, China should establish a clear understanding facing the continuing rise of undergraduate graduation rate in order to achieve the goal of building a powerful country of higher education.
分 类 号:G640[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117