检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津大学教育学院,天津300072
出 处:《教育发展研究》2017年第3期29-33,共5页Research in Educational Development
摘 要:职业教育"协商治理"说试图从根本上扭转政府"家长式"的一元治理模式。然而,研究者以"协商治理"的逻辑自然推导出"职业教育善治"的结论,在一定程度上忽视了政府的主导作用,这不免又走入了另一种误区。职业教育治理只有遵循政府主导的职业教育治理逻辑,实施政府主导的"协商治理"模式,才能真正实现职业教育治理体系和治理能力现代化的目标。为此,政府必须准确定位其在职业教育治理中的主导责任,并积极探寻其履行职业教育发展责任的应有路径。The "consultative governance" model of vocational education fundamentally reversed the government's paternalistic" governance model However, when the researchers advocate "consultations governance", they ignore the leading role of the government. They derive "consultative governance" into "vocational education good governance", which is undoubtedly a paradox. Vocational education governance only follow the government-led governance logic and implement the government-led "consultative governance" model, can it truly achieve vocational education governance system and governance ability's modernization goals. Therefore, the government must accurately locate its leading responsibility in vocational education governance in order to boost vocational education governance system and governance ability modernization.
分 类 号:G719.2[文化科学—职业技术教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117