汤一介哲学概念范畴进路的方法论反思  

A Methodological Reflection through the Concept Categorical Approach of TANG Yi-jie

作　　者：杜保瑞[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]台湾大学哲学系 [2]大连理工大学,辽宁大连116024

出　　处：《深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2017年第2期68-74,共7页Journal of Shenzhen University：Humanities & Social Sciences

摘　　要：汤一介的中国哲学研究涉及范畴体系问题、内在超越特性问题、知识论、解释学的建构等重大问题。从方法论反思角度看,汤先生有哲学议题开题的创作之功,这是他哲学家的面向;但他更有推动文化复兴的社会运动的实践实效,这是他实践家的面向。作为传统中国文化的推手而言,汤先生在20~21世纪之交的角色扮演,堪可媲美太虚大师在20世纪上半叶的中国人生佛教运动的推动者角色。笔者提出宇宙论、本体论、工夫论、境界论的解释架构,以补范畴研究的不足,以及澄清内在超越意旨的重心,并提出系统性、检证性、适用性、选择性的议题,充实汤先生对中国哲学知识论建构的关怀。In this paper, the author makes a reflection on the methodology of the study of Chinese philosophical problems by Mr. TANG Yi-jie. This paper mainly focuses on the research of the category system of Chinese philosophy, as well as the problems of the Intrinsic Transcendence, the theory of Knowledge and the construction of Hermeneutics. The author believes that Mr. TANG＇s creation is to opening the title of the philosophical issues, this is his philosopher oriented. But he has the practical effect of promoting the social movement of the Renaissance, which is the oriented of his practitioners. As a promoter of traditional Chinese culture, the author believes that, Mr. TANG＇ s role play from twentieth Century to twenty-first Century can rival the role of Master Taixu in the promotion of the Chinese Life Buddhist movement in the first half of the twentieth century. The author proposes an explanation framework as was cosmology, ontology, Gongfu theory and JingJie theory to supplement the shortcomings of the category research approach and to clarify the focus of intrinsic transcendence. And put forward the systematic, examination, applicability and selectivity issues to enrich Mr. TANG＇s construction of Chinese philosophy of knowledge.

关 键 词：汤一介 概念范畴 内在超越 儒学 知识论 解释学 

分 类 号：B2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]