检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]第四军医大学航空航天医学院,西安710032
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2017年第6期792-795,共4页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71272145)
摘 要:目的 考察不当督导、领导-成员交换及临床护士工作投入之间的关系,为护理管理中领导力与护士工作投入提升提供依据.方法 采用不当督导量表、领导-成员交换量表和工作投入量表,对西安市2所三甲医院使用随机抽样方法选取的597名临床护士进行调查,用SPSS 16.0统计软件进行数据分析.结果 发放问卷620份,收回有效问卷597份.不当督导总分为(18.52±6.09)分,领导-成员交换总分为(26.13±4.37)分,工作投入总分为(47.87±11.62)分.不当督导与工作投入呈负相关(r=-0.23,P〈0.01),领导-成员交换与工作投入呈正相关(r=0.44,P〈0.01).不当督导对于员工工作投入有负向预测作用,领导-成员交换在不当督导与工作投入之间起完全中介作用.结论 护理管理者应尽量避免采取不当督导的领导方式以提高领导-成员交换质量,有益于提升临床护士的工作投入度.Objective To investigate the relationship among leader-member exchange with abusive supervision and work engagement in nurses, to improve the leadership in nursing management and the promotion of nursing work.Methods A total of 597 nurses in two Xi'an tertiary general hospitals,who were selected by convenient sampling method,were investigated by abusive supervision scale,leader-member exchange scale and work engagement scale. The data was analyzed by software SPSS 16.0.Results A total of 620 questionnaires were distributed with effective 597 questionnaire collected. The total score of abusive supervision was(18.52±6.09),leader-member exchange score(26.13±4.37),and work engagement score (47.87±11.62). With the demographic variables controlled,abusive supervision was negatively related to work engagement(r= -0.23,P〈0.01),and leader-member exchange had a positive effect on work engagement in nurses(r=0.44,P〈0.01).Abusive supervision exerted a negative effect on nurses' work engagement through the medium of leader-member exchange.Conclusions Abusive supervision should be avoided to improve the quality of leader-member exchange quality,which is benefit to work engagement in clinical nurses.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.77