基于SOLO分类理论的高考数学试题思维层次分析——以2016年全国卷(理科)为例  

An Analysis of the Thinking level of College Entrance Examination Questions of Mathematics Based on SOLO Taxonomy Theory——Taking the National Science Volume in 2016 as an Example

作　　者：艾珲琏 周莹[2] 

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学 [2]广西师范大学数学与统计学院

出　　处：《教育测量与评价》2017年第5期58-64,共7页Educational Measurement and Evaluation

基　　金：2017年广西研究生教育创新计划项目(XYCSZ2017073);广西高等教育本科教学改革工程项目"基于‘三维六何’理念;培养反思型数学师范生"(2015JGZ112);2016年度研究生教育创新计划项目"研究生联动培养模式研究--以数学课程与教学论方向为例"(JGY2016003)研究成果

摘　　要：利用SOLO分类理论对高考理科数学试题进行思维层次的分析,可以为优化高考数学试卷结构和教师教学提供参考。文章基于SOLO分类理论,从问题解决角度出发,设计了高考数学试题的思维层次划分标准。结果表明,2016年3份全国卷整体思维层次处于多点结构和关联结构水平之间,且卷Ⅰ>卷Ⅱ>卷Ⅲ;3份试卷思维层次分布的总体走势相近,集中分布在多点结构和关联结构水平,处于抽象扩展结构水平的试题最少;3份试卷对5个领域内容的考查及其分值比例基本一致,但每份试卷中各领域试题考查的思维层次有一定差异,且分布不均,其中卷Ⅱ最为明显。基于此,高考数学试题命制人员需设计更多可以考查学生高层次思维的试题,关注试题思维层次分布的全面性;高中数学教师需着力培育学生的综合运用能力和创新思维,同时兼顾学生思维水平的差异性。The SOLO taxonomy theory for analyzing the thinking level of college entrance examination questions of mathematics in the national science volume can provide reference for optimizing the structure of papers for mathematic entrance examination and teachers＇ teaching. Basing on the SOLO taxonomy theory and the perspective of solving problems, the research designs a dividing standard of thinking level of the college entrance examination questions. The results show that the overall level of thinking on three volumes is between “ multi-structural $ and “ relational” ,which represents the fact that volume I〉volume II〉volume III. Furthermore, the overall trend is similar which focuses on the levels of “ multi-structural” and “ relational” , and questions on the level of “extend abstract” are at least. The scoring proportion of the content in five areas among the 3 papers is basically same. But questions of each examination paper in different areas have different thinking levels and uneven distributions, especially in volume II. To sum up, the individuals who plan college entrance examination questions of mathematics should design more questions to examine students’ high-level thinking, and take into account the comprehensiveness of thinking level. Mathematics teachers in high schools should concentrate on cultivating students’ comprehensive application ability and creative thinking, and meanwhile giving attention to students! differences in the thinking level.

关 键 词：SOLO分类理论 试题思维层次 高考数学试题 

分 类 号：G632.474[文化科学—教育学]