体育模块课程与体育单元教学的比较分析  

A Comparative Analysis of PE Module Curriculum and PE Unit Teaching

作　　者：张新[1] 路春雷 夏思永[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南大学体育学院,重庆400700 [2]加拿大布鲁克大学教育学院

出　　处：《西藏大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第1期195-200,共6页Journal of Tibet University

基　　金：2014年度中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助"重庆市民族传统体育课程模块的构建与实施途径研究"(项目号:SWU1409182);2015年度国家留学基金委员会青年骨干基金项目"中加体育模块课程构建与实施路径研究"(项目号:201406995082)阶段性成果

摘　　要：模块课程和单元教学是在体育教育理论和实践中运用比较频繁的两个概念,但同时两个概念存在相互混淆的现象。文章从词源学、逻辑学和教育学、心理学的理论基础三个维度对模块课程和单元教学进行了辨析。研究结果表明,模块课程与单元教学在词源学方面存在较大差异。在逻辑关系上,模块课程是单元教学的上位概念,单元教学是为模块课程服务的,同时单元教学也会对模块课程产生反作用,促进模块课程的修订和完善。此外,模块课程和单元教学是建立在不同的心理学和教育学理论基础之上的。对模块课程和单元教学两个概念的廓清,将有利于体育模块课程有效实施以及体育新课程标准的进一步发展。Module curriculum and unit teaching are the two concepts frequently applied in the theory and practice of physical education （PE）, but the confusion of these two concepts is commonly found. This article attempts to distinguish these two concepts on the theoretical basis of etymology, logic, pedagogy, and psychology. It is found that module curriculum and unit teaching are quite different in etymology. In logic module curriculum is a broad- er concept than unit teaching, and unit teaching is in the service of the revision and improvement of module cur- riculum. In addition, the two concepts are built on different psychological and pedagogical theories. Distinguish- ing these two concepts will benefit the effective implementation of module curriculum in PE and the further de- velopment of PE new curriculum standards.

关 键 词：模块课程 单元教学 概念 差异 

分 类 号：G807.01[文化科学—体育训练]