高校社会科学教师科研评价主体权力配置及其运行机制研究  

On the Subject Power Allocation and Its Operating Mechanism of Scientific Research Evaluation of University Teachers in Social Sciences

作　　者：史万兵[1] 曹方方[1] 

机构地区：[1]东北大学文法学院,辽宁沈阳110169

出　　处：《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第3期312-318,共7页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金资助项目(BFA150043)

摘　　要：探究高校社会科学教师科研评价主体权力配置及其运行机制,对于规范高校社会科学教师科研管理、推动大学学科整体建设具有重要价值。在界定核心概念的基础上,运用文献研究法及案例分析法,厘清各评价主体的具体权力、内在逻辑,总结当前存在的学术权力缺失、评价机构喧宾夺主,以及学术共同体"自律性"滑坡、评价主体"一身多职"、监督问责机制缺失等现象,进而提出确立共同体核心地位、合理发挥评价机构主体权力、唤醒各评价主体的内在自觉,完善"回避"制度和健全监督机制等建议,旨在提高我国高校社会科学教师科研管理效能,推动高校良性发展。Exploring the subject power allocation and its operating mechanism of scientific research evaluation of social science teachers in China＇s universities is of great value to standardize the management of social science teachers in universities and promote the overall construction of university disciplines. After defining the core concepts, literature analysis and case study were applied to clarify the concrete subject power as well as internal logic, and summarize the existing problems, including the lack of academic power, domination of evaluation agencies, decline of academic communities＇ ＂self-discipline＂, multiple identities of evaluation subjects, and lack of supervision and accountability mechanism. In order to improve the management efficiency of scientific research of social science teachers in China＇s universities and promote the benign development of universities, the following relevant suggestions were put forward, confirming the core position of academic communities, reasonably exerting the subject power of evaluation agencies, arousing the consciousness of evaluation subjects, and improving the ＂avoidance＂ system and supervision and accountability mechanism.

关 键 词：高校 社会科学 教师 科研评价 主体权力 

分 类 号：G60[文化科学—教育学]