论刘蕺山诠释《大学》的“至善”关怀  

On the Concept of “the Supreme Good”in the Interpretation of The Great Learning by Liu Jishan

作　　者：申鹏宇[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江工业大学马克思主义学院,浙江杭州310023

出　　处：《邵阳学院学报（社会科学版）》2017年第3期68-73,共6页Journal of Shaoyang University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"刘蕺山理学问题意识研究"(15YJC720022);浙江工业大学教改项目"中国传统文化案例融入思修课堂的实践"(JG1440)

摘　　要：刘蕺山作为晚明重要的理学家,他对《大学》一书予以了格外的关注。在时代问题的反思上,他认为晚明王学对无善无恶的过分强调引生了很多流弊,因而需要重新强调至善。这种义理关怀影响到了他对《大学》改本的选择与诠释。在《大学》改本的选择上,他因为不满朱熹与王阳明的《大学》改本,而选择崔铣的古本与丰坊的伪石本。在《大学》的义理诠释上,他以《中庸》作为《大学》的注疏,以"知止"括尽《大学》工夫,将工夫归结在诚意上,最终将《大学》工夫都指向了至善。Liu Jishan, as an important Neo-Confucianism scholar in the late Ming dynasty, paid close attention to The Great Learning. He renewed the concept of ＂the supreme good＂ because of the deficiencies in Wang Yangming＇s overemphasizing the idea ＂no good and no evil＂, which influenced his selection and interpretation to the revised editions of The Great Learning. His dissatisfaction with the reversion of The Great Learning by Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming drove him to prefer the reversions by Cui Xian and Feng Fang. In his interpretation of The Great Learning, he took The Doctrine of the Mean as reference for the commentaries of The Great Learning, explaining the thoughts of philosophical connotations such as the principle ＂wisely suspending＂ through Kung Fu which in turn is based on sincerity. So what truly matters is ＂the supreme good＂.

关 键 词：刘蕺山 诠释 《大学》 至善 诚意 

分 类 号：G40-053[文化科学—教育学原理]