金圣叹《水浒传》评点中的“画”、“奇”范畴研究  

A Study on the Category of Hua (Painting) and Qi (Rarity) in Jin Shengtan's Commentary of Water Margin

作　　者：刘坤鹏[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学文学院,湖北武汉430079

出　　处：《阜阳职业技术学院学报》2017年第2期103-105,共3页Journal of Fuyang Institute of Technology

摘　　要："画"、"奇"是感悟式批评中常见的评点术语,但这两个范畴在金圣叹评点中被注入了新的内容。他借鉴了诗画的批评理论,提出"画"应做到"兼形"和"传神",所关注的"奇"深入到了小说的肌理,由"技"深入到"道",使"奇"获得了新的内涵。在他的评点中,"画"和"奇"是一体的,具有互文性的关系。Hua(painting) and qi(rarity) are common commentary terms in sentimental criticism, but these two as categories are injected new content into Jin Shengtan's commentary. Jin draws on the criticism theory of poetry and painting, and points out that hua should be 'shaped' and 'vivid' and that qi should deep into the texture of a novel so that both hua and qi have gained a new connotation. Therefore, hua and qi are unified with intertextual relationship in his commentary.

关 键 词：金圣叹 《水浒传》 “画” “奇” 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]