检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:葛伟[1] 王骞[2] 王晓明[1] 张倩[1] 薛明涛[1] 李翠[1] 王艳妮[1]
机构地区:[1]第四军医大学西京医院老年病科,西安710032 [2]第四军医大学2012级临床医学专业,西安710032
出 处:《中华医学教育杂志》2017年第3期407-410,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Education
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81471409、81271449);中华医学会医学教育分会和中国高等教育学会医学教育专业委员会2016年医学教育研究立项课题(2016A-QK002);第四军医大学2012年度青年英才支持计划([2012]-19)
摘 要:目的评价以案例为基础学习(case.basedlearning,CBL)教学方法结合“是什么-为什么-怎么样-怎么办”(What-why-How-Howdo,W2H2)思维教学方法在老年病科临床见习中的教学效果。方法以在老年病科临床见习的45名学生为研究对象,随机分为CBL+W2H2教学组(n=23)和传统教学组(n=22),分别进行临床带教。通过理论考核、病例书写考核及问卷调查比较两组教学效果。结果CBL+W2H2教学组学生不仅在考核成绩上优于传统教学组学生,而且在学习主动性、医患沟通能力、学员自信心建立方面也优于传统教学组学生。结论CBL教学方法结合W2H2思维教学方法有助于提升老年病科见习的教学质量。Objective To investigate the effect of ease-based learning (CBL) and What-Why-How- How do (W2H2) thinking training in clerkship in geriatrics department. Methods 45 clerkship students in the department of geriatrics were randomly divided into CBL + W2H2 teaching group ( n = 23) and traditional teaching group ( n = 22). At the end of clerkship, theoretical examination, clinical case writing examination and questionnaire were carried out. Results The scores of students in CBL + W2H2 teaching group were higher than those in traditional teaching group. In addition, the learning initiative, the ability of doctor-patient communication and self-confidence of students in CBL + W2H2 teaching group were better than those in traditional teaching group. Conclusions Combined teaching methods of CBL and W2H2 thinking training can im- prove the teaching quality in the clinical clerkship in geriatrics department.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68