我国远程教育研究2016年度进展报告  

2016 Annual Review on Distance Education Research of China

作　　者：毕磊[1] 朱祖林[2] 郭允建[3] 汤诗华[1] 刘盛峰 

机构地区：[1]安徽广播电视大学现代远程教育研究所 [2]安徽广播电视大学学习资源中心 [3]安徽广播电视大学办公室 [4]安徽广播电视大学教育科学学院,安徽合肥230022

出　　处：《远程教育杂志》2017年第5期15-26,共12页Journal of Distance Education

基　　金：全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题"成人在线学习心理与行为的监控与评价研究"(GKA103007);安徽省高校人文社会科学研究重点项目"基于学生体验的远程教育质量评价研究"(SK2017A1023);"成人远程学习者专业认同的理论与实证研究"(SK2017A1024)的研究成果

摘　　要：延续系列研究的总体设计,对2016年度我国远程教育研究进行计量分析和述评,并与2013-2015年数据对比分析。研究发现:(1)研究主题分布极化,重实践、轻理论的现象没有明显改观,远程教与学、技术与媒体、管理、资源、学习者等5个主题持续成为热点,MOOCs、网络课程、开放教育资源、翻转课堂、混合式学习、移动学习、在线学习、教学模式、交互、开放大学、学分银行和学习环境等12个关键词连续高频;(2)研究方法的应用不断规范,定量、定性和混合研究所占比重整体呈上升趋势,其中定量研究持续占据绝对多数;(3)研究主体与实践主体分离加剧,普通高校占比逐年增长,而专门从事远程教育的开放大学(广播电视大学)占比下降明显。The status of distance education research of China in 2016 is quantitatively analyzed and reviewed by adopting the research design of our series of research and comparing with the data of 2013-2015. We found that：（1） The distribution of research topics is extreme. The practice research is continuously paid more attention to, while the theory research is still ignored. Distance teaching and learning, technology and media, management, resource, and learner continue to be the annual hot topics. MOOCs,network course, open education resources, flipped classroom, blended learning, mobile learning, online learning, teaching model,interactive, Open University, credit bank, and learning environment are continuous high frequency keywords.（2） The application of research methods constant norms, the total proportion of quantitative, qualitative and mixed research is uptrend, and quantitative research continues to be majority absolutely.（3） The separation between principal researcher and principal practitioner is intensifying,the proportion of traditional universities has been increasing year by year, while the proportion of the Radio and Television Universities that specializes in distance education has been decreased significantly.

关 键 词：远程教育 研究主题 研究方法 研究主体 共现分析 

分 类 号：G728[文化科学—成人教育学]