ESI在世界一流大学与学科评价中的问题与对策研究  

The problems and solutions for world-class universities and subjects evaluation using ESI

作　　者：史竹琴[1,2] 朱先奇[1] 

机构地区：[1]太原理工大学经济与管理学院,山西太原030024 [2]太原科技大学经济与管理学院,山西太原030024

出　　处：《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第6期84-91,共8页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：山西省高校人文社科重点研究基地项目"山西省本科高校社会科学类学科竞争力评价研究(2016309)";山西省高校"131"领军人才工程项目"中西部地方高校绩效评价研究(2015052009)"

摘　　要：ESI是基于SCI和SSCI的统计数据库,在世界一流大学与学科评价中发挥着非常重要的参考作用,受到了国内高校的广泛关注。在此背景下,文章讨论ESI在世界一流大学与学科评价中应注意的六大问题,如ESI的成果分配方式与国内的通行分配方式存在差异,ESI的不同检索方式获取同一评价目标数据得到的结果不尽相同等。在此基础上,针对问题提出在实践中应采取的应对措施,如要精准把握ESI中各指标的内涵、结果显示、基准线及阈值标准、检索方式,要更加重视高水平论文和拔尖人才的发现等。ESI, based on SCI and SSCI, plays an important role in world-class universities and subjects evaluation and attracts broad attentions from domestic universities. Under this background, we discussed the six problems in world-class universities and subjects evaluation using ESI, such as the differences between the method of output allocation in ESI and that used in general in China; the different retrieval results for the same evaluation objects. On the basis of these problems, corresponding solutions were put forward, such as accurately grasping the connotation of indicators, result shows, baselines and thresholds, and retrieval methods; further valuing the discovery of high-level papers and scientific elites.

关 键 词：ESI 一流大学 一流学科 教育评价 

分 类 号：G40-058.1[文化科学—教育学原理]