检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡乐乐[1] HU Le-le(Department of Education, Ocean University of China , Qingdao 266100, China)
出 处:《高等教育研究》2017年第9期91-109,共19页Journal of Higher Education
基 金:江苏省社会科学基金一般项目(16JYB007)
摘 要:美国高校自20世纪20年代中期率先引入学生评教以来的90年历史,可以分为兴起、盛行与反思三大阶段。随着研究的拓展、丰富和深化,有关学生评教的争议一再涌现并使探究不断深入。争议的核心包括学生评教的复杂影响因素,学生评教得分与其学习结果的相关性,以及现代在线评教与传统纸笔评教哪种更为可靠。由于学生评教的复杂性,以及为了维护教师切身利益,美国高校学生评教研究的反思结论是高校须谨慎使用学生评教结果,不能一味盲信。Student evaluations of teaching was first introduced in US colleges and universities in 1920s. From 1927 to 2017, there were three main periods during the ninety years history: rise, popularity, and reflection. With continuous, extensive, and deepened researching in its gradual development, more and more controversies of student evaluations of teaching were emerging, and arousing researchers to make further research. Core of the controversies includes three aspects: complex factors impacting student evaluations of teaching, correlation between scores of student evaluations of teaching and students learning outcomes, and modern online evaluations and traditional paper-pencil evaluations which has good reliability. Colleges and universities must make use of results of student evaluations of teaching cautiously, because of complexity of student evaluations of teaching and vital interests of instructors.
分 类 号:G649[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.244