检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]国家食品药品监督管理总局药品评价中心,北京100045 [2]中国食品药品国际交流中心,北京100082
出 处:《中国药物警戒》2017年第9期527-529,533,共4页Chinese Journal of Pharmacovigilance
摘 要:目的总结日本上市后评价经验,为我国建立药品上市后评价制度提供参考。方法通过学术交流和查阅文献,比较日本和我国药品上市后评价的异同。结果日本上市后评价主要是由再评价和再审查两大制度构成。通过再评价制度解决"老药"的缺陷,同时通过再审查制度推动了"新药"的监测和研究。这些制度有效覆盖了日本所有的药品。结论日本的药品上市后评价制度极具特色,可为我国构建药品上市后评价体系提供参考。Objective To provide a reference for the establishment of post-marketing evaluation system in China by summarizing the experience of post-marketing evaluation in Japan. Methods The similarities and differences between drug post-marketing evaluation in China and in Japan were compared by academic exchanges and the literature. Results Japanese post -marketing evaluation is mainly composed of two systems, which were reevaluation and reexamination. The reevaluation system is for solving the "old medicine" defects, and the reexamination system is for promoting the "new drug" monitoring and research. These systems effectively cover all of Japanese medicines. Conclusion Japanese post-marketing evaluation system is very unique, suitable for reference to the construction of Chinese drug post-marketing evaluation system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.135.237