检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵金松[1] 冯兴垚 刘茗铭 边名鸿[1,2] 袁晓龙 罗广[1]
机构地区:[1]四川理工学院生物工程学院,四川自贡643000 [2]酿酒生物技术及应用四川省重点实验室,四川自贡643000
出 处:《四川理工学院学报(自然科学版)》2017年第5期20-25,共6页Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Natural Science Edition)
基 金:酿酒生物技术及应用四川省重点实验室项目(NJ2013-03);四川理工学院研究生创新基金(y2017045)
摘 要:以粗滤后的桂花鸭梨果酒为试验对象,加入壳聚糖、硅藻土、明胶、海藻酸钠、皂土、聚乙烯聚吡咯烷酮(PVPP)和复合果胶酶等不同澄清剂处理,并对处理前后酒体的透光率、色度、理化指标及感官指标进行了测定及对比分析。结果表明:单一澄清剂壳聚糖澄清效果最好,添加量为0.8 g/L时,透光率达95.9%;壳聚糖-复合果胶酶-pvpp复合澄清剂的澄清效果优于单一澄清剂,其最优组合为PVPP为0.8 g/L,壳聚糖为1 g/L,复合果胶酶为0.06 g/L,透光率为97.9%。Different clarifiers which including chitosan,diatomite,gelatin,sodium alginate,bentonite,PVPP and compound pectinase were used to clarify the osmanthus-pear fruit wine. Effects were evaluated through the measurement of the light transmittances,shades,physical-chemical properties and sensory features of the wine before or after the clarification.The result showed that: chitosan has the best clarification effect when single clarifying agent was applied,and the light transmittance reached 95. 9% with the optimum addition of 0. 8 g/L. When compound clarifying agent was applied,chitosan/compound pectinase/PVPP had better clarification effect than others,and the optimal combination was 0. 8 g/L of PVPP,1 g/L of chitosan and 0. 06 g/L of compound pectinase,which has the light transmittance of 97. 9%.
分 类 号:TS262.7[轻工技术与工程—发酵工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28