中文阅读中副中央凹区域文本信息加工时程的眼动研究  

Time Course of Linguistic Information Extraction from Parafoveal Words during Eye Fixations in Chinese Reading

作　　者：刘妮娜[1,2] 王霞 闫国利[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津300074 [2]国民心理健康评估与促进协同创新中心,天津300074

出　　处：《心理科学》2017年第6期1289-1295,共7页Journal of Psychological Science

基　　金：天津市哲学社会科学规划课题(TJJX15-023);国家自然科学基金项目(31600902);天津市哲学社会科学规划课题(TJJX15-016)的资助

摘　　要：副中央凹文本对阅读有非常重要的作用,考察读者在注视何时起对其加工有助于解决阅读中词汇加工方式的理论问题,当前研究结果存在很大争论。本研究采用消失文本范式,操纵词n-1和n+1的呈现时间(0m/40ms),考察读者加工两侧副中央凹信息的时程。结果发现,相比0ms,在注视早期40ms内,词n+1的呈现能够显著促进阅读加工,而词n-1未对阅读产生影响,表明右侧副中央凹信息的加工发生在注视早期,而左侧则未发生在该早期阶段。结果支持阅读眼动控制的并列加工模型。The visual field can be divided into three regions： the foveal region （the central 2°in of vision）, the parafoveal region （extending out to 5°on either side of fixation）, and the peripheral region （beyond the parafoveal region） during reading. Although readers mainly acquire information from foveal region, effective extraction of information from parafoveally visible words is also essential to skilled reading. While numerous studies have examined the acquisition of visual information form during fixational pauses during reading, little is known about how rapidly useful visual information is acquired from different gaze locations when reading non-alphabetic languages such as Chinese. Therefore, the present study used disappearing text paradigm to investigate the extraction of useful information from papafoveal words to the right （word n＋1） and left （word n-1） of fixation in Chinese reading. We manipulated simultaneously both the location （word n＋1 and word n-1） and display time （0ms and 40ms） for parpfoveal words. In the disappearing text condition, the word n＋1 or word n-1 disappeared a fixed period after the beginning of fixation （0ms or 40ms following the onset of fixation）. Eyelink2000was used to record the eye movements of 40 college students. All participants read sentences formed from regular sequences of two-character words and each sentence was between 6 and 8 words long. In order to examine the lexical processing, each sentence containing either a high or low frequency target word. The results suggested that there were some differences in the time needed for information capture between word n＋1 and word n-1.Readers could obtain most or all of necessary information of word n＋1 for normal lexical and reading processing in the early period of fixation on word n（40ms）. However, the information extraction from word n-1 occurred at relatively late period of fixation on word n （later than 40ms）. In particularly,（1）serious disruption on overall reading ti

关 键 词：副中央凹加工 消失文本 中文阅读 眼动 

分 类 号：B842.1[哲学宗教—基础心理学]