从文学语言的“内指性”说起  

Start with Literary Discourse “Referring the Inside”

作　　者：严金东[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆师范大学文学院,重庆401331

出　　处：《重庆师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第6期13-18,共6页Journal of Chongqing Normal University Edition of Social Siences

基　　金：重庆市社科基金项目"钱穆文化诗学研究"(编号2016YBWX072)

摘　　要：某本通行的文学理论教材认为,"日常话语是外指性的,而文学话语是内指性的……内指性的话语指向作品本身的世界,它不必符合现实生活的逻辑"。诸如此类的说法,是对"逻辑"一词的错误使用。"内指""外指"的区分,只是表面上的对文学性质的语言本体论观察,实质上还是文学艺术与生活实践的二元区分,是一种变相的文学虚构论。"内指""外指"的区分,并不能真正说明文学文本的独立自主。文学文本的独立自主,主要是观察文学的一个相对视角,不是文本自身绝对的客观构成。A popular literary theory textbook thought, ＂daily discourse refers to the outside, but literary discourse refers to the inside.., and it refers to the world of the text itself, it does not have to conform to the logic of real life＂. This is the wrong use of the word ＂logic＂. The distinction between ＂refers to the inside＂ and ＂refers to the outside＂ is just on the surface of the nature of literature language ontology observation. In essence, it is the distinction between the practice of life and the world of literature and it is a disguised form of fictionality theory. The distinction between ＂internal＂ and ＂external＂ does not mean that literary texts can be truly in- dependent. The independence of literary texts is mainly from a relative perspective of literature observation, but not from the absolute objective of the text itself.

关 键 词：内指性 逻辑 文本独立 

分 类 号：I06[文学—文学理论]