检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:毛利丹 Mao Lidan(School of Education Science, Zhengzhou Normal University, Zhengzhou Henan 450044, China;School of Education, Henan University, Zhengzhou Henan 475004, China)
机构地区:[1]郑州师范学院教育科学学院,郑州450044 [2]河南大学教育科学学院,开封475004
出 处:《课程.教材.教法》2018年第5期138-143,共6页Curriculum,Teaching Material and Method
基 金:河南省教育科学规划重大招标课题"未来课堂教学的技术规范研究"([2018]-JKGHZDZB-16)
摘 要:一线教师是教师评价的利益相关者,在评价中的地位与作用不容小觑。通过对我国已有教师评价模式的分析,以及从教师的视角对教师评价模式应用的调查发现,一线教师及其对评价的认知并未受到应有的重视。建立理想型的教师评价模式,有利于突出教师在评价中的核心地位与关键作用。而加强学校共同体文化和教师评价制度建设,则可以为理想型教师评价模式的有效应用提供保障措施和动力支持。As the stakeholders of teacher evaluation, the front-line teachers' status and role in the evaluation should not be underestimated. According to the analysis of existing models of teacher evaluation in China and the survey of the application of teacher evaluation models from teachers' perspectives in practice, it is found that the proper attention is not yet paid to the front-line teachers and their perceptions on evaluation. Teachers lack basic rights of participation and discourse in the evaluation. Therefore, through the establishment of an ideal teacher evaluation model, it aims to emphasize the core status and key role of teachers in the evaluation. Through strengthening school community culture and teacher evaluation system construction, it could provide guarantee measures and power support for the effectiveness of the ideal teacher evaluation model.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33