检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:莫倩[1] 张小珊[1] 杨丹[1] MO Qian;ZHANG Xiao-shan;YANG Dan Guiyang(College of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Guiyang,Guizhou Province,550001 China)
机构地区:[1]贵阳中医学院,贵州贵阳550001
出 处:《中国卫生产业》2018年第19期123-124,共2页China Health Industry
基 金:贵州省高等学校教学内容和课程体系改革项目;贵阳中医学院教学研究与改革项目[贵中医教改合字(2016)10号]
摘 要:目的提高学生学习兴趣、动手能力,增强学生针灸临床思辨能力。方法将2014级针灸推拿班的66名学生按学号分为分组讨论组和传统教学组,每组各33名,分别接受分组讨论教学模式和传统教学模式。一学期结束后对两组学生进行问卷调查,并分析其结果。结果①分组讨论能增强学生的学习能动性。②增加分组讨论内容、分组学习后及时进行讨论可明显提高学生对所学内容的学习兴趣。结论分组讨论教学模式符合自主学习、全体学习、探究学习的新课程理念。Objective This paper tries to improve students' interest in learning and hands-on ability, and enhance their acupuncture clinical thinking ability. Methods 66 students of the 2014 grade acupuncture and massage class were divided into discussion group and traditional teaching group according to their student numbers. Each group had 33 students. They accepted group discussion teaching mode and traditional teaching mode respectively. After the end of one semester, two groups of students were surveyed and the results were analyzed. Results ①Group discussion can enhance students' learning initiative;②Increasing the content of group discussion and discussing in a timely manner after group learning can significantly improve students' interest in learning the content. Conclusion The group discussion teaching model is consistent with the new curriculum concept of independent learning, all learning, and inquiry learning.
关 键 词:《针灸治疗学》 见习教学 分组讨论教学模式 传统教学模式 实践探索
分 类 号:R245[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.199.13