检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周如意[1] 龙立荣[2] 张军伟[3] ZHOU Ruyi;LONG Lirong;ZHANG Jtmwei(,School of Management,Wuhan Institute of Technology,Wuhan 430205,China;School of Management,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,China;College of Economics and Management,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉工程大学管理学院,武汉430205 [2]华中科技大学管理学院,武汉430074 [3]华中农业大学经济管理学院,武汉430070
出 处:《科学学与科学技术管理》2018年第8期145-160,共16页Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71232001;71602065;71703118);湖北省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(18Q072);武汉工程大学科学研究基金项目(K201774)
摘 要:考察了自我牺牲型领导对团队绩效的作用效果、作用机制及其边界条件。基于76名团队领导及其所属的329名团队成员的有效配对问卷数据,采用层次回归分析,结果表明:(1)自我牺牲型领导与团队绩效正相关;(2)团队凝聚力中介了自我牺牲型领导与团队绩效之间的关系;(3)团队领导心理资本以及团队成员心理权利在其中发挥调节效果,不仅调节了自我牺牲型领导对团队绩效的正向影响,还调节了团队凝聚力的中介作用,当团队领导心理资本较低以及团队成员心理权利较高时,自我牺牲型领导对团队绩效的正向影响以及团队凝聚力的中介作用均不显著,反之,显著。This aim of the study is to examined the effect of self-sacrificial leadership on the team performance at the team level. These hypotheses were tested with a sample of 76 teams' leaders and 329 team members Hierarchical regression analysis was applied to test these hypotheses. The results revealed that self-sacrificial leader- ship was positively related to team performance. The relationship between self-sacrificial leadership and team per- formance was mediated by team cohesiveness. Further, leaders' psychological capital and team members' psycho- logical entitlement played a moderating effect. When the leaders' psychological capital was lower and team members' psychological entitlement were higher, the effect of self-sacrificial leadership on the team cohesiveness and performance, and the mediation effect of team cohesiveness weren't significant, on the contrary, the above effects were significant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.205.205