《淮南子》“道”论再议  

Reconsideration of “The Ultimate Truth” in Huainanzi

作　　者：王效峰[1] WANG Xiaofeng(School of Literature and Communication,Xianyang Normal University,Xianyang 712000,Shaanxi,China)

机构地区：[1]咸阳师范学院文学与传播学院,陕西咸阳712000

出　　处：《咸阳师范学院学报》2018年第5期7-12,共6页Journal of Xianyang Normal University

基　　金：陕西省教育厅哲学社会科学重点研究基地项目(16JZ090);咸阳师范学院科研基金项目(13XSYK001)

摘　　要：《淮南子》以道家之"道"来贯穿其思想体系。虽秉承老庄,其"道"却与老庄判然有别:其对"道"的理解,虽承认"道"的本源性存在,却削弱了老庄之"道"的超验玄想品格;其对"道"的描述,虽具象易感,却缺少了对老庄之"道"的抽象思辨。这或与汉初"务于治"的实用态度相关。Huainanzi runs through its ideological system with＂the ultimate truth＂of Taoism. Despite his adhering to Zhuangzi, his understanding of＂Tao＂is quite different from that of Zhuangzi. His understanding of＂Tao＂acknowledges the original existence of＂Tao＂, but weakens Zhuangzi＇s transcendental and metaphysical character of＂Tao＂; his description of＂Tao＂is not an abstract speculation of＂Tao＂by Zhuangzi, though it is easy to imagine. This is also related to the practical attitude of＂governance-orientedness＂in the early Han Dynasty.

关 键 词：《淮南子》 道 道家 实用主义 

分 类 号：B234.4[哲学宗教—中国哲学]