何晏玄学思想探析——以《道论》《无名论》两篇为例  

On He Yan's Metaphysics——A Case Study of Tao Theory and Unknown

作　　者：田宝祥[1] TIAN Baoxiang(Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China)

机构地区：[1]首都师范大学,北京100048

出　　处：《龙岩学院学报》2016年第3期103-107,共5页Journal of Longyan University

摘　　要：何晏的玄学思想以"贵无论"为主,其论著大多佚失,仅以片断之文章留存于世。《论语集解》虽较为完整,但经考证,乃多人合著,故难归一家之言。现存文献材料当中,惟张湛《列子注》中的《道论》《无名论》两篇,较为可靠。《无名论》主要讨论本体与现象的关系,论证"无名"高于"有名","本"为上、"末"为下。《道论》既追寻"道"与"无"两大范畴的本体意义,又解释"有生于无"的宇宙生成问题。此外,何晏还创造性地提出了"无所有"与"有所有"两大对立统一的概念范畴,以求厘清物、我二体之异,明晰天、人二道之别。He Yan's thought is mainly about “ Nothingness” in philosophy, most of whose works are gone, only a small part has been preserved. The Analects of Confucius is relatively complete, although we can conclude that it is not the work of an individual. This paper deeply analyzes He Yan's twTo remaining wTorks, Tao Theory and Unknown. The former focuses on the relation between ontology and appearance, and proves “nothingness” is greater than “ being” . The latter pursues the meaning of “Tao” and “ Nothingness” as 'well as explains the question that “ being” comes from “ nothingness” . In addition, the notions of “ beingnothingness”and “being-being” was creatively promoted by He Yan for the first time. The ultimate aim is to show the differences between substance and ego, and separate the nature from human beings.

关 键 词：何晏 道论 无名论 魏晋玄学 

分 类 号：B235.1[哲学宗教—中国哲学]