检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈子豪[1,2] 王茂剑 张健 侯志刚[5] 井月欣 王共明 赵云苹 刘芳 CHEN Zihao;WANG Maojian;ZHANG Jian;HOU Zhigang;JING Yuexin;WANG Gongming;ZHAO Yunping;LIU Fang(College of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 200000, China;Shandong Marine Resource and Environment Research Institute, Yantai 264006, China;Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Restoration for Marine Ecology, Yantai 264006, China;Shandong Freshwater Fisheries Research Institute, Jinan 250013, China;School of Food Science and Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230000, China)
机构地区:[1]上海海洋大学食品学院,上海200000 [2]山东省海洋资源与环境研究院,山东烟台264006 [3]山东省海洋生态修复重点实验室,山东烟台264006 [4]山东省淡水渔业研究院,山东济南250013 [5]合肥工业大学食品科学与工程学院,安徽合肥230000
出 处:《食品科学》2017年第12期196-203,共8页Food Science
基 金:山东省现代农业产业技术体系刺参产业创新团队建设项目(SDAIT-22-07);烟台市科技发展计划项目(2014ZH081);山东省重点研发计划项目(2016GSF115034);山东省2016年重点研发计划(创新型产业集群)项目(2016ZDJQ0205)
摘 要:以盐渍仿刺参为研究对象,以感官评分和脱水速率加权后的综合评分作为评价指标,采用单因素试验及响应面法对冷风干制(cold-air drying,CAD)工艺条件进行优化,并对CAD、真空冷冻干制(vacuum freeze drying,VFD)、热风干制(hot-air drying,HAD)和真空微波干制(vacuum microwave drying,VMD)工艺处理的仿刺参进行品质比较分析。结果表明:CAD最佳干制工艺条件为真空脱盐时间4.2 h、冷风温度19℃、冷风风速1.70 m/s,仿刺参的综合评分为0.77。在营养保持方面,VFD和CAD比HAD和VMD效果更好;在热收缩率方面,HAD>VMD>CAD>VFD,其中CAD和VFD差异不大;在复水倍数方面,CAD>VFD>HAD>VMD;在质构特性上,CAD和VFD质构指标明显优于HAD和VMD。对比结果说明CAD在工业生产中具有更高的实用性。The present work was done to optimize the process conditions for cold-air drying(CAD)of pickled Apostichopusjaponicus by the combined use of one-factor-at-a-time method(OFAT)and response surface methodology(RSM).Theresponse variable was the weighted average of sensory scores and dehydration rate.A comparison of CAD,vacuum freezedrying(VFD),hot-air drying(HAD)and vacuum microwave drying(VMD)was performed in terms of the quality of driedproducts.Results showed that the optimal cold-air drying conditions were determined as follows:vacuum desalination time,4.2h;drying temperature,19℃;and wind speed,1.70m/s,resulting in a weighted average of0.77.With respect to nutrientretention,VFD and CAD were better than HAD and VMD.In terms of heat shrinkage,the drying methods were in thedecreasing order of HAD,VMD,CAD and VFD with only a marginal difference being observed between CAD and VFD,while they followed the decreasing order of CAD,VFD,HAD and VMD in terms of rehydration rate.In terms of texturalcharacteristics,CAD and VFD were better than HAD and VMD.These results showed that CAD was more practical inindustrial production.
分 类 号:TS254[轻工技术与工程—水产品加工及贮藏工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.64.200