日本历史教科书问题的法理解读——以家永三郎教科书案为例  

Legal Interpretation of Japan's History Textbook Issues:An Example of Ienaga Textbook Review Case

作　　者：湛中乐[1] 黄宇骁 ZHAN Zhongle;HUANG Yuxiao(Law School of Peking University,Beijing 100080,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871

出　　处：《华东师范大学学报（教育科学版）》2018年第5期148-160,171,共14页Journal of East China Normal University:Educational Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"公法争议与公法救济研究"(16JJD820001)

摘　　要：作为世界最长公法诉讼,家永教科书案用法学的方法解决了复杂的历史教科书问题,是"政治问题法律解决"的典型代表。本案涉及一系列宪法、行政法、教育法的交叉问题,是比较法研究的良好素材。在法庭审理过程中,原被告围绕教育权归属问题,教科书审定制度与受教育权、学术自由、表达自由的关系,教育领域裁量行为的司法审查方法、行政程序中的正当程序原则适用、狭义的诉的利益等法律问题产生了激烈争论。我国公法学和教育法学研究中尚存在一系列亟待明确的问题,家永教科书案中体现的裁判法理具有一定借鉴意义。As the longest public law lawsuit in the world,Ienaga textbook case solved the complex history textbook issues in legal ways,and it is typical of“legal settlement of political issues”.The case involves a series of cross-cutting issues of constitution,administrative law and educational law,providing good material for the study of comparative law.During the trial of the court,the plaintiff and the defendant had a heated debate over the legal issues,such as the ownership of educational rights,the relationship between the system of textbook authorization and the right to education,academic freedom and freedom of expression,the judicial review method of discretion in the field of education,the application of the principle of due process in the administrative procedure,rule for avoiding constitutional questions,special benefits of suit.Still,there are a series of problems that need to be clarified in the research of public law and educational law in China.The jurisprudence embodied in Ienaga textbook case can provide some reference for us.

关 键 词：家永三郎 日本历史教科书 教科书审定 教育权 教育法 

分 类 号：D931.3[政治法律—法学] DD912.1[历史地理—历史学] K313.46-4[历史地理—世界史]