Impact of an acute hemodynamic response-guided protocol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding  

作　　者：José Ignacio Fortea ángela Puente Patricia Ruiz Iranzu Ezcurra Javier Vaquero Antonio Cuadrado María Teresa Arias-Loste Joaquín Cabezas Susana Llerena Paula Iruzubieta Carlos Rodríguez-Lope Patricia Huelin Fernando Casafont Emilio Fábrega Javier Crespo 

机构地区：[1]Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Marques? de Valdecilla [2]Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Marqués de Valdecilla [3]Centro de Investigación Biomédica Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas [4]Laboratorio de Investigación en Hepatología y Gastroenterología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Mara?ón-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Mara?ón

出　　处：《World Journal of Clinical Cases》2018年第13期611-623,共13页世界临床病例杂志

基　　金：Supported by Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Marqués de Valdecilla,No.NVAL17/07(to Fortea JI);Instituto Carlos III,No.PI15/01083(to Vaquero J)

摘　　要：AIM To evaluate the long-term outcome of an acute hemodynamic response-guided protocol in which acute responders to intravenous propranolol received traditional nonselective beta-blockers(NSBBs) and acute nonresponders received carvedilol.METHODS Retrospective review of a protocol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding guided by the acute hemodynamic response to intravenous propranolol. Fifty-two acute responders treated with traditional NSBB(i.e. propranolol or nadolol) were compared with 24 acute nonresponders receiving carvedilol. A second hemodynamic study was performed in 27 and 13 patients, respectively. The primary endpoint was development of first or further decompensation. Secondary endpoints included death from any cause, association between acute and chronic hemodynamic response, and baseline clinical and laboratory variables related to the acute hemodynamic response.RESULTS Acute responders and acute nonresponders presented similar 1, 2, and 3-year probabilities of first decompensation(NSBB: 0%, 13.7%, 26.1% vs carvedilol: 0%, 20%, 20%, P = 0.968) or further decompensation(21.2%, 26.1%, 40.9% vs 21.2%, 50.0%, 50.0%, P = 0.525). A previous episode of hepatic encephalopathy was the only independent predictor of decompensation [hazard ratio(95% confidence interval): 8.03(2.76-23.37)]. Mortality rates were similar in acute responders and acute nonresponders with compensated(P = 0.428) or decompensated cirrhosis(P = 0.429). No clinical, laboratory, endoscopic or hemodynamic parameter predicted the acute hemodynamic response. In patients receiving traditional NSBB, the acute and chronic changes of hepatic venous pressure gradient were correlated(r = 0.59, P = 0.001). Up to 69.2% of acute nonresponders gained chronic response with carvedilol.CONCLUSION Early identification and treatment with carvedilol of acute nonresponders to intravenous propranolol improves the clinical outcome of this high-risk group of patients, probably due to its greater effects for reducing portal pressure.AIM To evaluate the long-term outcome of an acute hemodynamic response-guided protocol in which acute responders to intravenous propranolol received traditional nonselective beta-blockers(NSBBs) and acute nonresponders received carvedilol.METHODS Retrospective review of a protocol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding guided by the acute hemodynamic response to intravenous propranolol. Fifty-two acute responders treated with traditional NSBB(i.e. propranolol or nadolol) were compared with 24 acute nonresponders receiving carvedilol. A second hemodynamic study was performed in 27 and 13 patients, respectively. The primary endpoint was development of first or further decompensation. Secondary endpoints included death from any cause, association between acute and chronic hemodynamic response, and baseline clinical and laboratory variables related to the acute hemodynamic response.RESULTS Acute responders and acute nonresponders presented similar 1, 2, and 3-year probabilities of first decompensation(NSBB: 0%, 13.7%, 26.1% vs carvedilol: 0%, 20%, 20%, P = 0.968) or further decompensation(21.2%, 26.1%, 40.9% vs 21.2%, 50.0%, 50.0%, P = 0.525). A previous episode of hepatic encephalopathy was the only independent predictor of decompensation [hazard ratio(95% confidence interval): 8.03(2.76-23.37)]. Mortality rates were similar in acute responders and acute nonresponders with compensated(P = 0.428) or decompensated cirrhosis(P = 0.429). No clinical, laboratory, endoscopic or hemodynamic parameter predicted the acute hemodynamic response. In patients receiving traditional NSBB, the acute and chronic changes of hepatic venous pressure gradient were correlated(r = 0.59, P = 0.001). Up to 69.2% of acute nonresponders gained chronic response with carvedilol.CONCLUSION Early identification and treatment with carvedilol of acute nonresponders to intravenous propranolol improves the clinical outcome of this high-risk group of patients, probably due to its greater effects for reducing portal pressure.

关 键 词：GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE PROPRANOLOL CARVEDILOL Liver CIRRHOSIS PORTAL hypertension 

分 类 号：R[医药卫生]