文化资本主义在文化保存及校本课程的作用  

The Function of Cultural Preservation of Culture Capitalism and Its Implications for School-based Curriculum

作　　者：姜添辉 JIANG Tian-hui

机构地区：[1]联合国教科文组织世界社会学学会教育社会学分会

出　　处：《南京师大学报（社会科学版）》2018年第6期23-30,共8页Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：全球化体系助长美国取得霸权地位,并对国际社会输出其霸权文化,尽管此种情况提升文化保护的重要性,但却产生抗拒论与融合论两种争辩。抗拒论主张,输入国家为保护自身的主权,以文化本土化的策略来维护国民的国家认同;融合论认为,由于国家是全球化的主要执行者,所以能将全球化压力转化成自身需求,这种全球在地化的现象能促进文化之间的交流与融合。本文指出这种争辩的关键点是,将能动性以及社会结构视为两个分立的维度,致使忽视他们的互补性。由于文化资本主义符合权力菁英的经济利益原则,这能使文化保存成为国家的重要政策,此种取向可提供更好的平台,地方居民得以藉此发挥文化创新的能动性。The globalized system assists America to acquire its hegemonic status that benefits the USA to export its hegemonic culture to the international community.While this milieu makes people raise their awareness of the status of local cultures,it has stimulated two contradictory arguments.The perspective of cultural localization highlights the linear relation among culture,national identity and state sovereignty.In contrast,the notion of glocalization values the interaction between different cultures.With regard to this debate,those who favor cultural localization adopt the idea of resistance,but those who support glocalization prefer the concept of fusion.Obviously,these two camps both ignore the interaction between agency and social structure.As culture capitalism meets the interest need of power elites who direct the operation of the state,cultural preservation can become the priority on political agendas.This situation benefits local inhabitants to employ their agency to elaborate local cultures.

关 键 词：文化本土化 全球在地化 文化保存 文化资本主义 校本课程 

分 类 号：G423[文化科学—课程与教学论] G112[文化科学—教育学]