检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑翠霞[1] 朱冬梅[2] 倪娟 徐娟[1] 纪进华 任靖[1] 万丽丽 Zheng Cuixia;Zhu Dongmei;Ni Juan;Xu Juan;Ji Jinhua;Ren Jing;Wan Lili(Department of Neurosurgery,the 81th Hospital,Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine,Nanjing 210002,China;Nursing Department,the 81th Hospital,Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine,Nanjing 210002,China;General Surgery,the 81th Hospital,Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine,Nanjing 210002,China)
机构地区:[1]南京中医药大学附属第八一医院神经外科,南京210002 [2]南京中医药大学附属第八一医院护理部,南京210002 [3]南京中医药大学附属第八一医院普外科,南京210002
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2019年第3期379-382,共4页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基 金:2017年江苏省品牌专业建设资助项目(PPZY2015C258);2017年南京中医药大学护理学品牌专业建设教学改革(4-8).
摘 要:目的探讨菜单式教学与传统教学模式在神经外科临床护理教学中星级学员的评比效果。方法选择2017年3月—2018年2月南京中医药大学附属第八一医院的实习护生128人,随机分为对照组及试验组各64人,均实行一对一临床带教。对照组采用传统的教学方法,试验组在此基础上叠加菜单式教学模式。比较两组实习效果和三星级及以上护生比例。结果试验组护生出科考试成绩总分(268.88±14.93)分,高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=-6.222,P<0.05)。试验组护生在医德医风及临床实践能力方面扣0~2分33人、扣7~9分8人,对照组分别为24、18人,差异有统计学意义(χ^2=5.256,P<0.05)。试验组护生被评为四星级及五星级学员的比例为39.1%,对照组为14.1%,差异有统计学意义(χ^2=10.439,P<0.05)。结论在神经外科临床护理教学中,菜单式教学模式可提高护生能力和考核成绩,激发护生的学习兴趣。Objective To explore the effects of menu teaching and tradition teaching model in star student appraise among nursing students in clinical nursing teaching of neurosurgery department. Methods From March 2017 to February 2018, we selected 128 nursing students in internship at the 81th Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine. All of the nursing students were randomly divided into control group and experimental group, 64 cases in each group with one-to-one clinical teaching. Control group carried out tradition teaching model. On this basis, experimental group applied menu teaching. We compared the practice effects and the ratio of nursing students with 3-star or above. Results The total score of examination performance of nurses in experimental group was (268.88±14.93) higher than that in control group with a statistical difference (t=-6.222, P<0.05). There were 33 nursing students being deducted marks 0-2 and 8 nursing students being deducted 7-9 in medical ethics and clinical practical competency in experimental group;there were 24 and 18 nursing students in control group respectively;the difference was statistical (χ^2=5.256, P<0.05). There were 39.1% of nursing students being ranked as 4-stat or 5-star in experimental group and 14.1% in control group with a statistical difference (χ^2=10.439, P<0.05). Conclusions In clinical nursing teaching of neurosurgery, menu teaching model can improve abilities and examination performance, stimulate the learning interest of nursing students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3