检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢妮[1] XIE Ni(School of Educational Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China)
机构地区:[1]贵州师范大学教育科学学院,贵州贵阳550025
出 处:《湖南师范大学教育科学学报》2019年第2期112-117,共6页Journal of Educational Science of Hunan Normal University
摘 要:叶波博士的《课程知识选择:从"谁的"到"何以可能"》一文存在未对知识做出清晰的界定、未察觉出课程的隐性假设即是知识的合法性问题、论述中焦点位移、未触及当代社会中个体的安身立命等问题。其原因在于作者未能识别出课程知识在从"什么"到"谁的"再到"何以可能"的转换中,始终是一个封闭性和排他性概念。在个体化时代,我们需要一种竞争的知识观和助力个体自我关怀的教育观,保持课程知识的开放性,尤其致力于个体自我关怀的方法性知识,以增强个体应对不确定性的能力。There are four problems in Dr. Ye Bo’s article “The Choice of Curriculum Knowledge: from ‘Whose’ to ‘How Can It Be Possible’”. The first one is that knowledge is not clearly defined. The second one is that he does not realize the implicit assumption of curriculum is the legitimacy of knowledge. The third one is the shift of focus in the discussion. The fourth one is that it does not touch upon the individual’s life in contemporary society. The reason is that the author fails to recognize that curriculum knowledge is always a closed and exclusive concept in the transformation from “what” to “who”, then to “how possible”. In the era of individualization, we need a competitive view of knowledge and a view of education that can support the self care of individual, maintain the openness of curriculum knowledge, especially the methodological knowledge of individual self care in order to improve their ability to deal with uncertainty.
分 类 号:G423[文化科学—课程与教学论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28