检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:石肖雪[1] Shi Xiao-xue
机构地区:[1]苏州大学王健法学院
出 处:《苏州大学学报(法学版)》2019年第2期71-81,共11页Journal of Soochow University:Law Edition
摘 要:庭审式的听证程序,在被移植到行政过程中时出现了适用困境。为此,需将听证的核心内涵还原为行政过程的参与主体之间的理性沟通行为。听证是行政权正当性之参与模式的典型代表,这一程序性制约机制为行政过程注入了交往理性的特质。据此,听证程序的构成要件可分为基础要件和功能要件。行政听证的基础性构成仅包含基础要件,目的在于保证有效的沟通过程;功能性构成则包含了基础要件和功能要件,用以形成不同的沟通类型,而目前庭审式的听证程序只是正式听证的一种类型。面向行政任务的听证制度,应在保证有效沟通的基础上具有更弹性化的程序安排。The traditional form of hearing is an adversary trial-type process, which meets some predicaments when it is transplanted to the administrative process. Essentially hearing is a process of communication. The participation of private parties in hearing process makes the behavior of administrative agency become a communication behavior. Hearing itself with essential elements aims at fulfilling an effective communication, while functional hearing is the one with the same essential elements which make a fair hearing and also different functional elements which form different types of hearing. The traditional form of hearing is just one but not the only kind of formal hearing. When discussing about the forms and elements of administrative hearing procedure in a task-oriented approach, we are proposing the one with different types of hearing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.140.254.100